Skip to main content
Choose the right audit path

Compare Website Privacy Audit Plans

Not every website needs the same level of review. Start with automated visibility, then move into manual evidence, remediation, or monitoring only when your risk level calls for it.

Auditzo provides technical observations and evidence-focused reporting. We do not provide legal advice, legal certification, or final legal compliance determinations.

Decision shortcut

Choose by outcome

Pick the option based on what you need to do next, not just the report price.

  • Want a quick scan? Start with Free Audit.
  • Need a PDF? Use Standard Report.
  • Need deeper signals? Use Detailed Evidence Report.
  • Need human review? Use Manual Evidence Audit.
  • Need fixes? Use Tracking Remediation.
  • Need ongoing checks? Use Privacy Monitoring.

Quick decision guide

Use this section if you are not sure where to start. Each option has a different purpose.

I just want to check my site

Free Website Audit

Best for a first look at cookies, trackers, and basic website privacy signals.

Run Free Audit
I need a downloadable report

Standard Report

Best when you need a practical PDF report for internal review or developer discussion.

Explore Automated Reports
I need human review

Manual Evidence Audit

Best for focused human-reviewed technical evidence across a defined website scope.

View Manual Audit
I need issues fixed

Tracking Remediation

Best when your report shows technical issues and you want help fixing consent, GTM, scripts, or pixels.

Get Remediation Help
I need ongoing visibility

Privacy Monitoring

Best when your site changes often and you want monthly visibility into new cookies, trackers, and requests.

View Monitoring

Full comparison table

Compare the main Auditzo options side by side. On mobile, swipe the table horizontally.

What you need Free Audit Standard Report Detailed Evidence Manual Evidence Audit Remediation Monitoring Law Firm / Enterprise
Best for First look Quick PDF review Deeper automated evidence Human-reviewed evidence Technical fixes Monthly change visibility Custom legal/privacy review support
Starting price Free $19 launch $49 launch Starting at $899 Starting at $499 Starting at $199/mo Custom proposal
Automated website scan Used as input Optional Custom scope
Downloadable PDF Email summary Fix summary Monthly report Custom format
Cookie and tracker visibility Basic Summary Deeper Human-reviewed Fix-focused Change-focused Custom depth
Third-party request review Limited Summary Detailed summary Request-level review where in scope Fix planning Monthly tracking Custom evidence package
Consent-state testing No No / limited Automated indicators No-interaction / reject / accept where applicable Post-fix validation Change monitoring Custom journeys
Human analyst review Optional add-on
Fix implementation Optional Custom
Best next step Run scan Compare reports View details Request audit Fix issues Monitor site Request proposal

Start small, but do not stay blind

You do not need to buy the biggest package first. But once you see serious tracking, consent, or request-level concerns, it is risky to ignore them.

A clean path is: scan first, understand the evidence, fix what matters, and monitor changes over time.

1

Scan

Run a free audit or use a paid automated report to understand current website behavior.

2

Review

Use the report to identify cookies, trackers, third-party requests, consent signals, and risk indicators.

3

Escalate only if needed

Move to manual audit, remediation, monitoring, or custom legal/privacy support based on what the evidence shows.

Common situations and the right Auditzo option

These are common reasons people come to Auditzo. Choose the option that matches the job you need done.

“I just want to know if something looks risky.”

Start with the Free Audit. It gives you early technical visibility without committing to a paid report.

Run Free Audit

“I need a PDF I can share internally.”

Use Standard Report if you need something practical for internal review or developer discussion.

Compare Automated Reports

“I need deeper evidence but not manual review yet.”

Choose Detailed Evidence Report. It adds more technical visibility than a basic scan.

View Detailed Evidence Report

“A person needs to review the evidence.”

Choose Manual Evidence Audit when you need human-reviewed observations, screenshots, and a focused evidence package.

View Manual Evidence Audit

“The report found issues. We need help fixing them.”

Choose Website Tracking Remediation for consent, GTM, script, pixel, and tracking behavior fixes.

Get Remediation Help

“Our site changes often. We need ongoing visibility.”

Choose Website Privacy Monitoring when new tags, plugins, scripts, or marketing tools may change tracking behavior.

View Monitoring

Common mistakes to avoid

These mistakes create confusion, false confidence, or unnecessary spend.

Expecting an automated report to be legal advice

Automated reports are technical visibility, not legal conclusions or compliance certification.

Buying too deep before checking basics

Start with a free scan or detailed report first unless you already need human-reviewed evidence.

Fixing blindly without evidence

Consent tools, GTM, pixels, and scripts should be changed based on observed behavior, not guesswork.

Running one audit and forgetting changes

Websites change. New scripts, plugins, and agency changes can introduce new tracking later.

Sample reports

Want to see what the reports look like?

Review sample report formats before choosing a plan. This helps you understand the level of detail before you pay for a report or request a manual review.

Questions before choosing a plan

Clear answers before you choose an audit level or request a proposal.

If you have not scanned the site yet, start with the Free Audit. If you need a report, choose Standard or Detailed. If the matter is serious or needs human review, choose Manual Evidence Audit.

No. It is a deeper automated report. Human-reviewed evidence is covered under Manual Evidence Audit.

You need remediation when your audit shows consent, GTM, script, pixel, cookie, or tracking behavior issues that need technical fixes.

Monitoring makes sense when your site changes often, when marketing teams add tools, or when you want recurring visibility into privacy-related website changes.

Law firms should use the Law Firm / Enterprise package when they need custom evidence scope, multi-domain review, custom report formats, or privacy/legal review support.

No. Auditzo provides technical observations and evidence-focused reports. Final legal compliance interpretation should be handled by qualified legal counsel.

Still not sure which option fits?

Run a free audit first, or ask Auditzo to recommend the right level of review based on your website and concern.