Start with a fast technical scan of your website’s cookies, trackers, consent signals, and third-party requests. Use it to understand what is happening before you decide whether you need a deeper manual review, remediation, or monthly monitoring.
Auditzo automated reports are built for quick technical visibility. They help website owners, developers, agencies, and privacy teams see what the site appears to be doing from a tracking and consent perspective.
For simple internal review, an automated report may be enough. For serious legal, privacy, or client-facing work, use the report as a starting point and move into a manual evidence audit, remediation, or monitoring when needed.
Automated reports provide technical observations and risk indicators. They do not replace legal advice, human investigation, or a custom evidence package for high-risk matters.
Keep it simple when you only need a first look. Go deeper when you need more technical evidence.
Best when you want a quick first look at website privacy and tracking behavior.
A practical report for teams that need more than a quick scan summary.
A deeper automated report for cookies, trackers, third-party requests, and technical risk signals.
The scan is designed to surface website tracking and consent-related signals that a team may need to review.
Observed cookies and browser storage signals that may need classification or review.
External domains and request activity observed during the automated website scan.
Analytics, advertising, marketing, heatmap, and other tracker-like activity where detectable.
Observable signals related to consent banners, consent behavior, and privacy controls.
Rendered page context that helps explain what was visible during the scan.
Plain-language flags that help decide whether deeper review or remediation is needed.
This is the simplest way to choose without getting lost in too many pages.
| Capability | Free | Standard | Detailed | Manual Audit | Remediation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automated scan | Optional | ||||
| Cookie and tracker visibility | Basic | Summary | Detailed | Human-reviewed | Fix-focused |
| Third-party request summary | Limited | Detailed | Human-reviewed | As needed | |
| Consent-state testing | Limited | Limited | Automated indicators | No / Reject / Accept where applicable | Verification after fixes |
| Manual analyst review | — | — | — | As scoped | |
| Fix implementation | — | — | — | — | |
| Best next step | Understand basics | Internal review | Deeper technical review | Legal/privacy review support | Fix issues |
A scanner can show signals. Serious decisions usually need context, review, or fixes.
For human-reviewed screenshots, consent-state observations, and deeper technical evidence.
View manual auditFor fixing cookie consent, GTM, scripts, pixels, and tracker behavior found in reports.
Fix issuesFor monthly visibility into new cookies, trackers, request changes, and consent changes.
Explore monitoringFor custom technical evidence packages for law firms and legal/privacy teams.
For legal teamsSample reports help users understand the level of detail before they buy or request a deeper review. For legal/privacy review, a manual or custom evidence package may be more suitable.
Auditzo automated reports are technical reports. They are not legal advice, legal certification, or a final compliance determination. They help you see signals and decide the next step.
If your situation involves a legal notice, serious privacy concern, enterprise review, or client-facing legal/privacy work, consider a manual evidence audit or a custom law firm evidence package.
Straight answers before you choose a report.
Run a free audit first. Upgrade only when your website, client, or privacy/legal team needs more detail.