Identify WCAG-oriented accessibility barriers across forms, navigation, keyboard access, focus states, labels, contrast, headings, and screen reader support with technical evidence and remediation guidance.
WCAG-oriented technical observations. Not legal advice, ADA certification, or a guarantee of compliance.
A website can look polished visually but still create barriers for users relying on keyboards, screen readers, zoom, assistive technology, or alternative navigation methods.
Menus, buttons, modals, forms, and interactive elements may not work properly without a mouse.
Missing labels, unclear required fields, weak error messages, or placeholder-only fields can block users.
Low contrast, small text, poor spacing, and weak visual states can make content difficult to read or use.
Poor heading structure, missing accessible names, and weak semantic markup can affect assistive technology users.
Auditzo reviews practical website accessibility barriers that affect real interaction, usability, and remediation planning.
Review tab order, focus visibility, keyboard traps, dropdowns, menus, buttons, forms, and modal behavior.
Check labels, required fields, validation messages, error identification, helper text, and form completion flow.
Review color contrast, text readability, visible states, image text concerns, and interface clarity.
Review accessible names, ARIA usage where relevant, heading structure, landmarks, labels, and semantic markup.
Check headings, links, navigation patterns, skip links, repeated components, and page structure.
Review alt text, decorative images, image-only content, captions where relevant, and media accessibility concerns.
Auditzo reviews accessibility using practical WCAG-oriented checks. The goal is to identify barriers that may affect people using keyboards, screen readers, zoom, assistive technology, or alternative navigation methods.
The report is built for business, legal, compliance, marketing, and development teams that need clear observations and remediation direction without overclaiming legal conclusions.
Can users access the content through text, visuals, audio, structure, or assistive technology?
Can users navigate, interact, submit forms, open menus, and complete actions without barriers?
Are instructions, forms, errors, buttons, navigation, and user flows clear enough to understand?
Does the website use structure and markup that can work more reliably with assistive technologies?
These are practical issues that often affect user experience, form completion, navigation, and conversion paths.
Accessibility needs both speed and context. Automated tools are useful, but interaction issues often need human review.
Useful for quickly finding many detectable issues such as missing labels, contrast warnings, empty buttons, and structural concerns.
Useful for real interaction issues that tools can miss, including keyboard flow, focus behavior, form usability, menus, and modals.
Scan one public webpage for supported automated WCAG 2.2 A/AA-oriented checks. Use the result as a first technical look, then move to human review when you need verified findings, interaction testing, evidence, or remediation guidance.
Automated testing does not determine complete WCAG conformance or ADA compliance.
Run Free Accessibility ScanThe report is designed to make accessibility findings easier to understand, prioritize, reproduce, and fix.
A business-readable overview of the most important accessibility observations and next steps.
Pages, templates, user paths, components, or flows included in the accessibility review.
Accessibility observations organized around practical WCAG concepts and user impact.
Visual evidence showing where the issue appears and why it may matter.
Findings grouped so your team can focus first on higher-impact or repeated barriers.
Clear steps your team can follow to reproduce selected issues.
Notes on where issues appear across templates, forms, navigation, or repeated UI components.
Practical guidance your developers or agency can use to understand and plan fixes.
Recommended next steps for fixing, retesting, or moving into accessibility remediation support.
Finding accessibility issues is useful only when your team knows what to fix. Auditzo reports are built to support developers, agencies, and internal teams with issue context, affected components, and remediation priorities.
Explore Accessibility Remediation SupportFindings are written with enough context to support your internal team, agency, or developer.
Focus first on high-impact barriers, repeated components, forms, navigation, and conversion-critical paths.
After updates are made, selected fixes can be reviewed again to confirm whether behavior improved.
Accessibility affects legal, compliance, user experience, marketing, development, and conversion teams.
Product pages, filters, cart, checkout, discount fields, and payment flows can create accessibility barriers.
Listings, forms, map embeds, galleries, floor plans, PDFs, and contact flows often need accessibility review.
Dashboards, tables, onboarding flows, forms, menus, and modals need accessible interaction patterns.
Useful before launch, after redesigns, or when clients need clear accessibility findings and fix priorities.
Helpful when teams need technical accessibility observations for review with counsel or internal stakeholders.
Landing pages, campaign forms, popups, and lead-generation pages should be accessible and usable.
This section keeps the audit scope clear. Auditzo helps with technical accessibility observations and remediation-oriented guidance, not legal conclusions.
Auditzo is built for teams that need accessibility findings they can understand, discuss, prioritize, and act on.
Reports focus on what was observed, where it appears, and what may need attention.
Findings are structured around recognized accessibility concepts without claiming legal certification.
Findings include context, reproduction notes, affected areas, and remediation direction.
Reports are written so legal, compliance, marketing, and website teams can understand the next step.
Accessibility review is valuable during redesigns, audits, migrations, and ongoing website improvements.
Accessibility review can sit beside privacy, tracking, cookie consent, and website compliance audits.
Share your website and the areas you are concerned about. Auditzo can help you decide whether an accessibility audit, remediation support, combined privacy and accessibility review, or manual evidence audit makes the most sense.
Get an ADA website accessibility audit with WCAG-oriented observations, screenshots, severity, reproduction steps, and remediation guidance.